Tool profile

NASA FIRMS

Satellite active-fire detections, maps and alerts

Verification: Pending Verification Status: Active
Best for Checking whether thermal detections are consistent with a reported fire within a defined place and period.
Workflow Mapping, Verification
Pricing / access Free ยท API, Browser-Based
Source checked 2026-09-19

Claims and corrections are reviewed before public profile changes.

NASA FIRMS official-page screenshot

Official-page screenshot

NASA FIRMS

Source checked 2026-09-19

Satellite active-fire detections, maps and alerts

Verification: Pending Verification Workflow: Mapping, Verification Pricing: Free

Best for: Checking whether thermal detections are consistent with a reported fire within a defined place and period.

Editorial

Signal summary

  • VendorNASA FIRMS
  • PlatformAPI, Web Platform
  • Reviewed2026-09-19

Trust / disclosure

How to read this profile

Editorial

Editorial line

Editorial judgment and commercial context are kept separate on OSINT4ALL.

Review status

This profile has an editorial review date. Source checking does not mean the tool was hands-on tested.

Claims / submissions

Corrections and claim requests are reviewed before any public change is made.

Commercial context

No commercial relationship is disclosed on this profile.

Editorial verdict

Use case and fit

This is editorial guidance, not vendor copy.

Best for

Checking whether thermal detections are consistent with a reported fire within a defined place and period.

Editorial read

Distinct active-fire product, not a duplicate of NASA Worldview.

Overview

Best for checking whether thermal detections are consistent with a reported fire within a defined place and period.

Operational snapshot

Workflow, access, and coverage

WorkflowMapping, Verification
PricingFree
AccessAPI, Browser-Based
RegionsGlobal
LanguagesEnglish
StatusActive
Tool function
Core jobs

Satellite and environmental observation, Structured public-interest and event data

Works from

Map Area, Coordinates, Date Range, Environmental Event, Location

Produces

Satellite Image, Environmental Layer, Change Observation, Event Record, Actor Record

Workflow roles

Verification, Analysis, Monitoring, Discovery

Recommended workflow

Set an area and UTC time window; inspect sensor and confidence fields; compare nearby detections; check imagery and weather; retain the original data and a cautious interpretation.

Language notes

English-first editorial profile. Verify current interface languages and source-language coverage; multilingual input does not guarantee equal analytical quality.

Limits

Strengths, caveats, and risk

Strengths

Time-stamped MODIS and VIIRS observations add an independent geographic signal.

Limitations

Clouds, overpass timing, pixel size and non-fire heat sources can affect interpretation.

A hotspot is not proof of an explosion, a particular cause, a burned structure or a named actor.

Risk note

A hotspot is not proof of an explosion, a particular cause, a burned structure or a named actor.

Check data licensing and avoid publishing sensitive geolocation details without a justified public-interest basis.

Trust note

Record coordinate systems, acquisition dates, resolution and uncertainty; validate important interpretations independently. Official-source desk research only; not hands-on tested. Tool-specific caution: A hotspot is not proof of an explosion, a particular cause, a burned structure or a named actor.

Maintenance

Source status & suggest an update

Help keep this profile accurate. Update requests are reviewed and logged before publication.

Source checked: 2026-09-19

If something is outdated, please submit a correction or ownership update request. Claim requests are reviewed and do not grant editorial control.

Commercial or sponsorship requests use the separate partner workflow.

Claim / Correct Listing