Collection

Tools for Company Records and Due Diligence

Editorial 8 tools 3 curated picks

A due-diligence stack for ownership checks, company records, executive context, and exposure triage.

Stack snapshot

8 tool profiles in this workflow, including 3 curated picks.

Best for

Due-diligence analysts, journalists, and investigators vetting companies, owners, leadership signals, and operational footprint.

Methodology

Selected tools that help verify legal entities, related domains, leadership signals, and public-risk context without relying on vendor self-description.

Editorial note

Editorial placement favors factual verification and cross-border usefulness over marketing reach.

Curated picks

Top pick

OpenCorporates

Budget pick

Companies House

Open-source pick

Aleph

Tools in this collection

Tools in this workflow

Due-diligence analysts, journalists, and investigators vetting companies, owners, leadership signals, and operational footprint.

Primary job: Registry-derived company records across supported jurisdictions

OpenCorporates

Role: Resolve the legal entity

Start by separating the company, brand, and website through available registry records, jurisdictions, officers, and filing references.

Editorial
View profile Visit tool

Primary job: UK company registrations, officers and filed documents

Companies House

Role: Check official UK filings

Use the official register for UK incorporation, status, officers, and filing documents, reading the underlying record rather than a summary alone.

Editorial
View profile Visit tool

Editorial proof card

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source checked 2026-05-27

Primary U.S. securities filings and company disclosures

Verification: Verification status not listed Workflow: Verification Pricing: Free

Best for: Primary U.S. public-company, fund, executive, ownership, and securities filing evidence.

Editorial

Primary job: US securities filings and disclosures submitted to the SEC

SEC EDGAR

Role: Read US issuer disclosures

Consult primary SEC filings for public-company ownership, financial, risk, and transaction disclosures when the entity falls within EDGAR coverage.

Editorial
View profile Visit tool
OpenSanctions official-page screenshot

Official-page screenshot

OpenSanctions

Source checked 2026-05-27

Sanctions, PEP, and watchlist context with source links

Verification: Verification status not listed Workflow: Verification Pricing: Freemium

Best for: Sanctions, PEP, watchlist, vessel, company, and public-interest screening where structured entity data and source lists matter.

Editorial

Primary job: Matching entities against sanctions and other risk-related datasets

OpenSanctions

Role: Screen identity-risk datasets

Use sanctions, PEP, and related datasets as identity-resolution leads, resolving names and dates before drawing any risk conclusion.

Editorial
View profile Visit tool

Primary job: Searching accessible investigative datasets and linking document evidence

Aleph

Role: Search investigative document sets

Find entities and relationships across published document collections, then trace every important claim back to its source material.

Editorial
View profile Visit tool
LittleSis official-page screenshot

Official-page screenshot

LittleSis

Source checked 2026-05-27

Public influence and relationship mapping

Verification: Pending Verification Workflow: Discovery, Mapping Pricing: Free

Best for: Mapping public relationships among people, companies, nonprofits, donors, officials, and organizations during influence research.

Editorial

Primary job: Exploring sourced relationships among influential people and organizations

LittleSis

Role: Map power and board relationships

Explore documented links among people, companies, boards, donors, and institutions while keeping influence claims separate from recorded relationships.

Editorial
View profile Visit tool
CourtListener official-page screenshot

Official-page screenshot

Free Law Project

Source checked 2026-05-27

Public U.S. legal opinions and docket context

Verification: Verification status not listed Workflow: Discovery Pricing: Free

Best for: U.S. legal, litigation, party, docket, court-opinion, and public-record context during due diligence or journalism.

Editorial

Primary job: US court opinions and available RECAP docket materials

CourtListener

Role: Locate US court records

Search opinions, dockets, and related legal material for litigation context, then confirm procedural status and the exact document language.

Editorial
View profile Visit tool

Primary job: Linking structured entity statements and external identifiers

Wikidata

Role: Normalize entity identifiers

Use structured identifiers and cross-database links to reconcile names and entities, checking referenced sources before relying on any statement.

Editorial
View profile Visit tool

Workflow notes

This collection is for analysts who need to move from a company name or website into a clearer picture of entity identity, public records, web presence, and risk context.

Use this stack when

A polished website, vendor claim, funding story, or public figure connection needs legal-entity grounding before deeper reporting or due diligence.

Recommended sequence

  • Start with OpenCorporates to test the legal-entity layer where registry coverage is available.
  • Use OpenSanctions when sanctions, PEP, or watchlist context is relevant, but treat matches as identity-resolution leads.
  • Use Aleph when the case becomes document-heavy and prior investigative material matters.
  • Use BuiltWith, Wappalyzer, and SecurityTrails to understand the web footprint behind a company domain.
  • Add Hunter only when staff-email patterns or domain-linked contact clues are part of the research question.

Specialist accountability sources

  • Use the ICIJ Offshore Leaks Database to test whether an entity, person, address, or intermediary appears in published offshore leak datasets; a match does not establish illegality, beneficial ownership, or current control.
  • Use OpenSecrets when U.S. campaign-finance or lobbying records are relevant to the relationship under review, and separate documented money flows from claims about motive or influence.

Editorial guardrail

This stack supports due diligence and public-interest research, not legal clearance. High-stakes decisions still need primary-source review and qualified advice.

Related OSINT4ALL paths

Use these connected pages when the same investigation needs a different entry point or a deeper decision aid.