Mitaka

Browser extension for quick IOC and threat-intelligence pivots

Verification: Pending Verification Status: Active
Best for Pivoting from domains, IPs, URLs, hashes, and CVEs into reputation and threat-intelligence sources during triage.
Workflow Enrichment, Pivoting
Pricing / access Free · Browser-Based
Source checked 2026-05-06

Claims and corrections are reviewed before public profile changes.

Signal summary

  • Vendorninoseki
  • PlatformBrowser Extension
  • Reviewed2026-05-06

Trust / disclosure

How to read this profile

Editorial

Editorial line

Editorial judgment and commercial context are kept separate on OSINT4ALL.

Review status

This profile has an editorial review date. Source checking does not mean the tool was hands-on tested.

Claims / submissions

Corrections and claim requests are reviewed before any public change is made.

Commercial context

No commercial relationship is disclosed on this profile.

Editorial verdict

Use case and fit

This is editorial guidance, not vendor copy.

Best for

Pivoting from domains, IPs, URLs, hashes, and CVEs into reputation and threat-intelligence sources during triage.

Editorial read

Useful for technical triage teams that already understand IOC context and need faster pivoting.

Overview

Best when indicators need quick browser-side pivots into threat-intelligence and reputation sources.

Operational snapshot

Workflow, access, and coverage

WorkflowEnrichment, Pivoting
PricingFree
AccessBrowser-Based
RegionsGlobal
LanguagesEnglish
StatusActive
Tool function
Core jobs

Browser shortcuts to external indicator searches and URL scans

Works from

Selected Indicator, URL, IP Address, Domain, File Hash

Produces

External Search Page, External Scan Request

Workflow roles

Lookup Routing, Triage

Interpretation limits

Mitaka routes to other services; it does not provide an independent reputation verdict. Search and scan actions have different disclosure effects. Check the destination and never forward confidential indicators without authorization.

Recommended workflow

Select an indicator, pivot into relevant sources, record source timestamps, compare signals, then decide whether the indicator needs deeper validation or can be discarded.

Language notes

Interface and documentation are English-first; downstream source content may vary.

Limits

Strengths, caveats, and risk

Strengths

Reduces repetitive indicator lookups and keeps common threat-intelligence pivots close to the browser workflow.

Limitations

It aggregates pivots rather than verifying them, and usefulness depends on the connected downstream sources.

Does not determine maliciousness by itself and is not proof without source review. Some sources may be stale, unavailable, rate-limited, or wrong.

Risk note

Indicator reputation can be overread. Shared infrastructure, parked domains, and old detections can create false confidence.

Keep triage passive unless authorized. Respect the terms and data-handling rules of each downstream source.

Trust note

Always cite the downstream source and timestamp, not just the extension, when using a result as evidence.

Maintenance

Source status & suggest an update

Help keep this profile accurate. Update requests are reviewed and logged before publication.

Source checked: 2026-05-06

If something is outdated, please submit a correction or ownership update request. Claim requests are reviewed and do not grant editorial control.

Commercial or sponsorship requests use the separate partner workflow.

Claim / Correct Listing